Just so you know where I’ve gone, I’m taking a bit of time off. I foresee a couple of weeks doing the trick.
I have gotten quite addicted to my internet activities, blogging most of all. I love to read and I love to write. Probably my favorite aspect is getting and leaving comments, just because that means we really cared about and/or enjoyed what the other person had to say and took the time to respond. That means the world to me.
But I am losing more than a few marbles at the present moment because of the weight I feel on my head. For the sake of my sanity, I fear I have to ditch all the priorities that I can, which means not my family or my familial duties, but everything else, no matter how important a part of my day it is, in order to relieve the pressure I feel. Come at it again hopefully refreshed and eager for more.
I might just be taking everything a bit too seriously. (Ya think?)
It makes me sad even thinking about it because I do love these words, I do love to sit here and imagine you reading them, I very much love visiting your sites and seeing what is new in your world and what you make me ponder or remember or dream. It feeds my brain, my social self and my soul.
From my overwhelmed position under the mountain of life that has fallen on my head, I don’t know what else to do right now.
Sorry, too dramatic. You can see why I need to back off and get a grip. Or maybe let go. Whatever gets me where I need to be.
I will see you, or rather, read you all soon.
Take care, my friends.
He had a chance to change public perception.
I don’t actually blame him. The anti-pot crowd is entrenched so deeply in their delusions about the evil marijuana plant that you’d have to essentially sacrifice your reputation, your future, everything, unless you kowtow to their judgment.
Instead of apologizing, as reported in the general media, like this article from CNN, he might have said, “I smoked pot. It shouldn’t be illegal. You people have it completely backwards; instead of the pot-smoking reflecting on my gold medals, the gold medals reflect on my pot-smoking. You all say that pot smokers are shiftless losers, that it destroys your entire life, that it is the gateway to all that is damnable on this earth. BUT I WON EIGHT GOLD MEDALS. Idiots.”
Like I said, I can’t blame him. He’s young, handsome, has his whole life to win more medals and get more sponsors and rake in the loot. Why should he put himself on the chopping block just to try to end a moronic witch hunt.
It’s just disappointing, that’s all. If he’d been drinking a beer, which according to statistics as well as common sense wreaks FAR more social havoc and destroys many more lives than marijuana, no one would have blinked.
But partaking of the devil’s own herb? Tsk tsk. Bad times.
Don’t worry, buddy, they’ll forgive you. You’re America’s darling, and hey, even Clinton admitted to smoking pot. Just didn’t have a picture published of himself sucking the chamber dry, that’s all.
And maybe in its own pathetic way, your little faux-pas might bring the US closer to a saner drug policy, eventually. The advocates of legalization might be able to point back at you from the distant future, show the judge and jury how the medals around your neck were chiming merrily against the bong as you leaned over to take a big hit.
You could have been their hero, your framed portrait hung next to Marley in every dorm room, but this’ll have to do.
If you had to make the perfect sandwich with five fixin’s (not including condiments, you can add those extra) what would be on it?
My perfect five-fixin’ sandwich:
- gouda cheese
- super-thinly-sliced red onion
I’d add a bit of mayonnaise.
Okay, great, now I’m hungry!!!
Quite timely, considering that Livi and I have been studying Lincoln in the past couple of weeks.
A pretty good event, especially the mock battle and the cannons firing!
A brief update to this post.
They’ve locked the website that had her journal entries regarding her child’s medical condition, so that link no longer works.
I think everything I talked about, no matter what the true situation with this mother allegedly trying to suffocate her child, is important is view of our developing medical technology and its ethical application to the suffering and dying.
However, none of it may be applicable in this case.
A possible theory is that the mother has Munchausen’s by proxy. The website I’ve linked to here may not be the best presentation of the “disease,” but it’ll give you the gist.
I felt a certain compassion when I thought the mother may have been attempting euthanasia out of desperation to end the suffering of her baby. But to suppose for a moment that it is Munchausen’s, that the baby may never have been ill or had any birth defects in the first place… unthinkable.
I think of the times when I have accidentally hurt my child… I think the worst one was when my oldest daughter was about one, in my haste I accidentally caught a bit of her belly when I was zipping her footie jammies. There was the tiniest little cut, and she wailed for about three minutes, but the guilt went on for days, until the little owie had healed and went away. Okay, that’s not true, I still feel a little guilty. But I never made that mistake again.
Even having to say no to my child — when we can’t go to the park, when it’s too close to dinner to have another cookie, when I have to finish the dishes and I can’t read a book right now — and seeing them be genuinely sad as a result is difficult for me.
I cannot even fathom hurting a child ON PURPOSE. Your OWN child. Causing your perfectly healthy child to suffer.
I’m not sure I’m going to be able to find any compassion on this one.
A quick summary: a memoir wherein the author, Jeroen Van Bergeijk, drives a Mercedes into West Africa to have a bit of an adventure as well as to turn a profit selling it to an African car dealer, or deserving cabbie, or whoever ends up actually producing the cash in the end.
It may be that in translation, pulled off by one John Antonides, the tight, clever character of the writing was utterly lost. But whatever the reason, a chant of the writer’s commandment to SHOW DON’T TELL grew in volume in my head as I progressed through the book.
Also, I think there is some kind of guideline about not treating your reader like a blockhead. If every time I read an analogy, and three sentences later the only thing I can think is, “DUDE! I get it…” then something needed to be edited, methinks. Let me soften this by saying, I was never actually insulted by the overexplaining; it is not pompous, just annoying.
That said, where else are you going to be able to read about an automobile trek across the Sahara? I’m sure there are other places, but there are enough things in the plus column to warrant joining Van Bergeijk’s trek:
1. It’s a pretty quick read, assuming you don’t have little kids interrupting you for food every couple of minutes.
2. The narrator is successfully presented as somebody you’d actually want to hang out with (even if he is a bit circuitously long winded).
3. He pulls in a lot of references to other relevant texts and some historical facts to illustrate the events and his observations, so you feel like you’re exploring the continent from several angles.
4. It takes a fairly balanced look at Africa – I’ve been studying the continent’s history and art for a few years, so I’m attuned to some of the common pitfalls as far as assumptions and prejudices go. The narrator manages to present his feelings (which tend toward compassion) but makes sure to include enough alternate testimony that you feel you’re getting a sufficiently broad crosscut of various points of view.
In conclusion: it’s worth a go, if the African continent holds any fascination for you.